Articles

Teong Negeri: Sentralitas Folklore Nama Lokal Komunitas dalam Jejaring Sosio-Kultural Islam Kristen di Maluku

Authors

  • Revaldo Pravasta Julian Mb SalakoryCorresponding Author,
  • Izak Yohan Matriks Lattu,
  • Rama Tulus Pilakoannu
  1. Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana, Jawa Tengah 🇮🇩
Received
October 8, 2019
Revised
April 15, 2020
Accepted
May 4, 2020
Published
May 31, 2020
https://doi.org/10.25077/jantro.v22.n1.p70-80.2020

Abstract

This article analysis about Teong Negeri has folklore centrality of community local name of Muslim-Christian socio-cultural network in Maluku. This study is qualitative research. Data were collected through interviews, documentary studies an observation. Methods analysis employed was descriptive qualitative. In the folklore of the village Wassu of Erihatu Samasuru (Christian), it has pela of the village of Haya Nakajarimau (Muslim) which means leader (older brother) for his three brothers, the village of Hatu Silalou (Christian) and the village of Tehua Lounusa Amalatu (Muslim). Communal narratives bind and become a link to give spirit to identity because society listens to local stories about Teong Negeri that have strong meanings, believing in each other. The four villages, in central Maluku, which are Wassu, Haya, Hatu, and Tehua, use the Teong Negeri symbol as an identity to maintain relations of kinship bond. The network that was built was challenged when the religious communal conflict happened, but the spirit towards the culture was always unheld. Teong Negeri became a symbol of central identity towards the traditional village that was able to regulate the socio-cultural system of every village in Maluku. not only for every community that has a bond of brotherhood or ethnicity. However, it becomes a universal symbol when, as a socio-cultural capital that is able to bridge the community from outside (buton migrants) based on cross-generation dialogue carried out by early generations of indigenous Maluku people with Buton migrants (migrants) in Maluku in order to have knowledge about the relationship harmonious.

Keywords

Folklore Centrality; Local Name; Islamic-Christian Cultural Networks in Maluku

References

  1. Andreeyan, Rizal. (2014). Studi Tentang Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pelaksanaan Pembangunan Di Kelurahan Sambutan Kecamatan Sambutan Kota Samarinda, Journal Administrasi Negara. Vol. 2 (4): 1938-1951
  2. Almizi M, Hermawati I. (2018). Upaya Pengentasan Kemiskinan dengan Mengurangi Konsumsi Rokok di Indonesia, Jurnal Pengembangan Pelayanan Kesejahteraan Sosial. Vol.17, No. 03, 2018
  3. Andriana, L. (2017). Kesejahteraan Sosial Tunagrahita Di Ponorogo, Journal Of Disability Studies. Vol. 4, No. 1, Doi: 10.14421/Ijds.040102
  4. Annur, Reza. (2013). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kemiskinan Di Kecamatan Jekulo Dan Mejobo Kabupaten Kudus Tahun 2013, Economics Development Analysis Journal. Vol. 02, No. 04, 2013
  5. Arum T, Haryanti R. (2017). Program Pemberdayaan Tunagrahita Melalui Kerajinan Keset Di Desa Karangpatihan Kecamatan Balong Kabupaten Ponorogo Tanjung Sekar Arum. Jurnal Wacana Publik. Vol . 1 No 3, 2017
  6. Ayub, Mahmood. (2013). Poverty And Inequality, Journal Of Emerging Market Economies. Vol. 5(3) 329–346, DOI: 10.1177/0974910113505796
  7. Bakry, Noor. (2015). ‘Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan’, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
  8. Barrientos A, Neff D. (2011). Attitudes To Chronic Poverty In The 'Global Village', Social Indicators Research. Vol. 100, No. 1, Pp. 101-114, DOI 10.1007/sl 1205-010-9606-7
  9. Biro Pusat Statistik. (2015). Data Penduduk 2014-2015. Jakarta
  10. Brady D, Burton L (2016). Handbook Of The Social Science Of Poverty. New York: Oxford University Press
  11. Bresson F, Duclos J. (2015). Intertemporal poverty comparisons, Social Choice and Welfare. Vol. 44, No. 3, pp. 567-616, DOI 10.1007/s00355-014-0855-2
  12. Chambers, R. (1987). ‘Pembangunan Desa, Mulai dari belakang’, Lembaga Penelitian Penerangan dan Ekonomi dan Sosial
  13. Chulaifah Dra. (2015). ‘Kontribusi Lembaga Pengembangan Dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Bina Insan Mandiri Dalam Pelayanan Pada Penyandang Masalah Kesejahteraan Sosial’, Yogyakarta: B2p3ks Press
  14. Dewachter S, Molenaers N. (2011). Who Takes A Seat At The Pro-Poor Table? Civil Society Participation In The Honduran Poverty Reduction Strategy, Latin American Research Review. Vol. 46, No. 3 (2011), Pp. 112-132, DOI: 101.203.171.61
  15. Dewi, Dian. (2016). Model Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Tunagrahita Di Kampung Idiot Kabupaten Ponorogo, Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan. Vol. 6 (1), April 2016
  16. Dwiningrum Siti (2015). ‘Desentralisasi dan Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pendidikan’, Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar Offset
  17. Haughton J, Khandker S. R (2012). ‘Pedoman Tentang Kemiskinan Dan Ketimpangan’, Jakarta: Salemba Empat
  18. Hermawan Y, Suryono Y. (2016). Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Penyelenggaraan Program-Program Pusat Kegiatan Belajar Masyarakat Ngudi Kapinteran, Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Vol. 3 , No. 1, 2016.
  19. Karsadi. (2016). ‘Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan di Perguruan Tinggi’, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
  20. Maryam E , Dewanti R. (2015). Partisipasi Masyarakat Terhadap Upaya Pengentasan Kemiskinan Berbasis Pemberdayaan Perempuan Melalui Program P3el Kabupaten Sidoarjo, Jurnal Psikologia. Vol. 3 No. 1 , Januari 2015
  21. Miradj S, Sumarno. (2014). Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Miskin Melalui Proses Pendidikan Nonformal Upaya Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Sosial Di Kabupaten Halmahera Baratâ€, Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Vol. 1, No. 1, 2014
  22. Munawaroh R, Listyani R. (2016). Praktik Sosial Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Miskin Idiot Melalui Model Kerajinan Di Desa Karangpatihan Kecamatan Balong Kabupaten Ponorogo, Jurnal Paradigma. Vol.04, No.04 Tahun 2016
  23. Mundkur A, Shepherd L. (2018). Civil Society Participation In Women, Peace And Security Governance Insights From Australia, Security Challenges. Vol. 14, No. 2, Pp. 84-105
  24. Ningrum H. (2014). Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Program Nasional Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Mandiri (Pnpm Mandiri) Di Kelurahan Karang Anyar Samarinda Ulu, Journal Sosiologi. Vol. 2 (3): 1-24
  25. Onyenemezu C. (2014). The Imperative Of Citizen’s Participation In Community Development, Academic Research International. Vol. 5 No. 1 Januari 2014
  26. Palmer M. (2011). Disability and Poverty: A Conceptual Review, Journal of Disability Policy Studies. Vol. 21, No. 4, 210–218
  27. Prastowo A. (2012). ‘Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dalam Perspektif Rancangan Penelitian’, Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media
  28. Rini A , Sugiharti L. (2016). Faktor-Faktor Penentu Kemiskinan Di Indonesia: Analisis Rumah Tangga, Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Terapan. Vol. 01(2): 17-33 Issn 2085-4617 Desember 2016
  29. Sridhar K. (2015). Is Urban Poverty More Challenging Than Rural Poverty? A Review, National Institute Of Urban Affairs (Niua). Vol. 6(2) 95–108, DOI: 10.1177/0975425315589159
  30. Sundaram J. (2012). Poverty Matters, Economic And Political Weekly. Vol. 47, No. 49, Pp. 22-26
  31. Tamba I , Cipta. (2016). Analisis Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Program Pengentasan Kemiskinan Masyarakat Pesisir Di Karangasem Bali, Jurnal Pertanian Berbasis Keseimbangan Ekosistem. Vol. 1, No 02 (2011)
  32. Tumbel T. (2014). Analisis Bantuan Desa Terhadap Pelaksanaan Pembangunan Desa (Studi Kasus Pada Kecamatan Tareran Kabupaten Minahasa Selatan), Jurnal Lppm Bidang Ekososbudkum. Vol.1 No. 2 Tahun 2014
  33. Triono B. (2018). Kebijakan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Difabel Idiot Di Desa Karangpatihan Kecamatan Balong Kabupaten Ponorogo Jawa Timur, Ji@P. Vol. 5 No. 1 Januari – Juli 2018
  34. Wahidin S. (2016). ‘Dasar-Dasar Pendidikan Pancasila dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan’, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Related Articles

View More Articles