Articles

Exploring the Social and Environmental Significance of the "Kang Pisman" Waste Management Movement in Bandung, Indonesia

Authors

  1. 1Universitas Padjadjaran 🇮🇩
  2. 2Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Padjadjaran University, Indonesia 🇮🇩
Received
April 15, 2024
Revised
June 4, 2024
Accepted
June 11, 2024
Published
June 14, 2024

Abstract

"Kang PisMan" is a waste management movement in Bandung City focused on reducing, segregating, and exploiting refuse. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the meaning of the movement in waste management and the broader impact of similar initiatives across the city of Bandung. Adopting Herbert Blumer's Symbolic Interactionism theory, the study analyzed the society's interpretation of the "Kang PisMan" movement, through the exploration of diverse experiences and perceptions of the community, the underlying actions and subsequent responses originating from this definition were further investigated. The results showed that the community participation in the "Kang PisMan" movement was influenced by the meaning as an initiative addressing waste management, providing benefits, and emphasizing collective responsibility. The implications of this meaning on waste management movements lay in fostering community contribution based on awareness, thereby enabling the initiative to implement sustainability.

Keywords

Social Movement; "Kang Pisman"; Definition; Waste Management

References

  1. Arimbawa, P. (2013). Peran Kelembagaan Agribisnis dalam Usahatani Kakao. Agriplus, 23(3), 149–154.
  2. Arimbawa, P., Batoa, H., & Afa, L. (2021). Faktor-Faktor Penentu Pola Pembelajaran Petani Dalam. 2748.
  3. Arini, A. A., Putu Arimbawa., & Abdullah, S. (2018). Peran Kelompok Tani Dalam Usahatani Padi Sawah ( Oryza sativa L ) Di Desa Belatu kecamatan Pondidaha kabupeten Konawe. Jurnal Ilmiah Membangun Desa Dan Pertanian, 3(1), 16–22.
  4. Bungin. (2008). Penelitian Kualitatif: Komunikasi, Ekonomi, Kebijakan Publik, Ilmu Sosial Lainnnya. Prenada Media Group.
  5. Concepción, E. D., Díaz, M., & Baquero, R. A. (2008). Effects of landscape complexity on the ecological effectiveness of agri-environment schemes. Landscape Ecology, 23(2), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9150-2
  6. Dewita, R. R. (2022). Mandarahi Kapalo Banda: Pemahaman Masyarakat Simancuang Terhadap Ruang Hidup Dan Penyelamatan Hutan. Jurnal Antropologi: Isu-Isu Sosial Budaya |, 02(December), 2–4.
  7. Efriani, Gunawan, B., & Garna, Yudistira K. (2019). Desain Kosmologi Sebagai Konservasi Alam Pada Komunitas Dayak. Jurnal Studi Desain, 2(2), 66–74. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342171536_DESAIN_KOSMOLOGI_SEBAGAI_KONSERVASI_ALAM_PADA_KOMUNITAS_DAYAK_TAMAMBALOH_DI_KALIMANTAN_BARAT
  8. FAO Food Security Programme. (2008). An Introduction to the Basic Concepts of Food Security Food Security.
  9. Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S. M., & Toulmin, C. (2010). Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science, 327(5967), 812–818. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185383
  10. Golawski, A., & Kasprzykowski, Z. (2021). Alternative foraging strategies in the white stork Ciconia ciconia: The effect of mowing meadows. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 319(February), 107563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107563
  11. Jannah, R., Jers, L. O. T., & Jalil, A. (2020). Bentuk Dan Faktor Bertahannya Solidaritas Kekerabatan Suku Jawa Di Desa Tridana Mulya Kecamatan Landono. KABANTI: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya, 4(1), 1–21. https://journal.fib.uho.ac.id/index.php/kabanti%0AISSN:
  12. Jatav, S. S., Nayak, S., Singh, N. P., & Naik, K. (2022). Measuring and Mapping Food Security Status of Rajasthan, India: A District-Level Analysis. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 6(April), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.831396
  13. Jers, L. O. T., Koodoh, E. E., Hasniah, H., Jalil, A., Ruspan Takasi, L. O. M., Alias, A., & Sindu, I. K. (2021). Culture and Food Security of The Mowewe Community During The Covid-19 Pandemic. Jurnal Antropologi: Isu-Isu Sosial Budaya, 23(2), 248. https://doi.org/10.25077/jantro.v23.n2.p248-255.2021
  14. Kittur, S., & Sundar, K. S. G. (2021). Of irrigation canals and multifunctional agroforestry: Traditional agriculture facilitates Woolly-necked Stork breeding in a north Indian agricultural landscape. Global Ecology and Conservation, 30(September), e01793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01793
  15. Koentjaraningrat. (1990). Pengantar Ilmu Antropologi. PT Rineka Cipta.
  16. Maleong, L. J. (1989). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (T. Surjaman (ed.)). Remadja Karya CV.
  17. Moonen, A. C., & Marshall, E. J. P. (2001). The influence of sown margin strips, management and boundary structure on herbaceous field margin vegetation in two neighbouring farms in southern England. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 86(2), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00283-8
  18. Natuhara, Y. (2013). Ecosystem services by paddy fields as substitutes of natural wetlands in Japan. Ecological Engineering, 56, 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.04.026
  19. Nosratabadi, S., Khazami, N., Ben Abdallah, M., Lackner, Z., Band, S. S., Mosavi, A., & Mako, C. (2020). Social Capital Contributions to Food Security: A Comprehensive Literature Review. Foods, 9(11), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9111650
  20. Nurti, Y. (2017). Kajian Makanan Dalam Perspektif Antropologi. Jurnal Antropologi: Isu-Isu Sosial Budaya, 19(1–10), 1–10.
  21. Oni, O. A., & Fashogbon, A. E. (2013). Food poverty and livelihoods issues in rural Nigeria. African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 1(3), 1–22.
  22. Rahmah, F. D. A., & Puspaningrum, D. (2021). Modal Sosial Kelompok Tani Budi Margomulyo II di Desa Pontang, Kecamatan Ambulu, Kabupaten Jember. Jurnal Antropologi: Isu-Isu Sosial Budaya, 23(2), 192–202. https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1144007663%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.25077/jantro.v23.n2.p192-202.2021
  23. Ratna, N. K. (2007). Teori, Metode, Teknik Penelitian Sastra. Pustaka Pelajar.
  24. Roy, H. E., Adriaens, T., Isaac, N. J. B., Kenis, M., Onkelinx, T., Martin, G. S., Brown, P. M. J., Hautier, L., Poland, R., Roy, D. B., Comont, R., Eschen, R., Frost, R., Zindel, R., Van Vlaenderen, J., Nedvěd, O., Ravn, H. P., Grégoire, J. C., de Biseau, J. C., & Maes, D. (2012). Invasive alien predator causes rapid declines of native European ladybirds. Diversity and Distributions, 18(7), 717–725. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2012.00883.x
  25. Singh, S. (2020). Farmers’ perception of climate change and adaptation decisions: A micro-level evidence from Bundelkhand Region, India. Ecological Indicators, 116(April 2019), 106475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106475
  26. Singh, S., & Naik, K. (2023). Regional Sustainability Measuring the agricultural sustainability of India : An application of pressure-state-response model. Regional Sustainability, 4(3), 218–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsus.2023.05.006
  27. Sugiyono. (2008). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitaif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
  28. Susanto, D. (2010). Strategi Peningkatan Kapasitas Modal Sosial dan Kualitas Sumberdaya Manusia Pendamping Pengembangan Masyarakat. Jurnal Komunikasi Pembangunan, 08(1), 77–89.
  29. Suwignyo, A. (2019). Gotong royong as social citizenship in Indonesia, 1940s to 1990s. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 50(3), 387–408. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002246341900

Author Biography

Bintarsih Sekarningrum

Departemen of Sociology Universitas Padjadjaran