Articles

Budaya Rimpu sebagai Eksistensi Perempuan Islam di Tanah Bima

Authors

  1. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta 🇮🇩
Received
August 13, 2019
Revised
August 14, 2019
Accepted
November 26, 2019
Published
December 16, 2019
https://doi.org/10.25077/jantro.v21.n2.p211-217.2019

Abstract

Bima people are known to be very religious, one of them being the Bima women who always cover their genitals. One of the well-known covers of genitalia in Bima is to use a Sarong, called the Rimpu. The purpose of this study wants to know the Rimpu culture as the existence of Islamic women in the land of Bima. This article compiled using the library research method. The results provided are Rimpu is genital cover clothes made of Sarong. The Rimpu has been in Bima since the first time Islam entered and applied to the sultanate in the land of Bima. The Rimpu divided into two types, namely regular Rimpu and Mpida Rimpu. The usual Rimpu split into two, namely Rimpu Colo and Rimpu Cili. The Rimpu Mpida divided into three kinds of Rimpu, namely, Rimpu Mpida, Rimpu Gala And Rimpu Cili. The Rimpu has multiple functions in addressing the times, as a religious identity, distinctive characteristics of Bima culture, and protector of women in interacting with the opposite sex. Nowadays, the government is trying to preserve it by holding a cultural parade every year.

Keywords

Budaya; Bima; Rimpu; Eksistensi; Perempuan.

References

  1. Ahimsa-Putra, H. S. (2014). Kebhinnekaan budaya sebagai modal merespons globalisasi. Literasi: Indonesian Journal of Humanities, 4(2), 167–175. Retrieved from https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/LIT/article/download/6268/4640
  2. Aksan, E. E. & Rochayanti, C. (2009). Komunikasi antarbudaya etnik jawa dan etnik keturunan Cina. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 7(1), 1–15. Retrieved from https://jurnal.upnyk.ac.id/index.php/komunikasi/article/view/6/34
  3. Baidhawy, Z. (2019). Dinamika radikalisme dan konflik bersentimen keagamaan di Surakarta. Journal of Social and Religious, 3(2), 43–68. https://doi.org/10.1234510/ri’ayah.v3i02.1319
  4. Balai Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa. (2016). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (Edisi keli). Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
  5. BM, S. A. (2014). Konflik sosial dalam hubungan antar umat beragama. Jurnal Dakwah Tabligh, 15(2), 189–208.
  6. Dewantara, A. . (2015). Pancasila dan multikulturalisme Indonesia. Studia Philosophica Et Theologica, 15(2), 109–126. Retrieved from https://ejournal.stftws.ac.id/studia/index.php/studia/VOL15/NO2/1
  7. Gunawan, K. & Rante, Y. (2011). Manajemen konflik atasi dampak masyarakat multikultural di Indonesia. Jurnal Mitra Ekonomi Dan Manajemen Bisnis, 2(2), 212–224.
  8. Hanggara, A. (2016). Nasionalisme etnis tionghoa di Indonesia. Equilibrium: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Dan Ekonomi, 14(2), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.25134/equi.v14i02.1129
  9. Hun, K. Y. (2011). Pramoedya menggugat: melacak jejak Indonesia. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  10. Juditha, C. (2015). Stereotip dan prasangka dalam konflik etnis tionghoa dan bugis makassar. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 12(1), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.24002/jik.v12i1.445
  11. Liliweri, A. (2018). Prasangka, konflik, dan komunikasi antarbudaya. Jakarta: Kencana.
  12. Lubis, L. A. (2012). Komunikasi antarbudaya tionghoa dan pribumi dalam penggunaan bahasa. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 10(3), 285–294. Retrieved from https://jurnal.upnyk.ac.id/index.php/komunikasi/article/view/46/50
  13. Lukman. (2018). Disintegrasi sosial budaya. Risalah: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Studi Islam, 4(2), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1311553
  14. Mahmud. (2011). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
  15. Mardhan, R. (2014). Akulturasi Antar Budaya Masyarakat Etnis Tionghoa dan Jawa. Universitas Sebelas Maret.
  16. Misyak, J.B., Melkonyan, T., Zeitoun, H., & Chater, N. (2014). Unwritten rules: virtual bargaining underpins social interaction, culture, and society. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(10), 512–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.05.010
  17. Muslim, A. (2013). Interaksi sosial dalam masyarakat multietnis. Jurnal Diskursus Islam, 1(3), 484–494. Retrieved from https://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/diskursus_islam/article/view/6642/5402
  18. Plummer, K. (2011). Sosiologi: the basic. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
  19. Richards, D. P. (2014). National identity in multicultural societies: the political use of national identity in Australia (Universiteit Leiden). Retrieved from https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/handle/1887/26187
  20. Soekanto, S. (2010). Sosiologi suatu pengantar. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
  21. Suseno, D. (2017). Komunikasi kesukubangsaan. Jurnal Antropologi: Isu-Isu Sosial Budaya, 19(1), 27–31. https://doi.org/10.25077/jantro.v19.n1.p27-31.2017
  22. Suwirta, A & Adam, A. (2012). Membincang kembali masalah etnisitas, nasionalitas, dan integrasi nasional di Indonesia. Atikan: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan, 2(2), 253–272. Retrieved from https://www.journals.mindamas.com/index.php/atikan/article/view/ 135/134
  23. Wahyuni, S. & Pelu, M. (2016). Pasang-surut relasi tionghoa-jawa di Surakarta. Hasil Penelitian Desentralisasi Penelitian Unggulan Perguruan Tinggi.
  24. Wattimena, L. (2010). Migrasi: etnisitas budaya sebagai identitas bangsa Indonesia. Jurnal Arkeologi Papua, 2(2), 25–35. Retrieved from https://jurnalarkeologipapua.kemdikbud.go.id/index.php/jpap/article/view/102/100
  25. Wihardit, K. (2010). Pendidikan multikultural: suatu konsep, pendekatan dan solusi. Jurnal Pendidikan, 11(2), 96–105. Retrieved from https://jurnal.ut.ac.id/index.php/JP/article/view/98

Related Articles

View More Articles