INTERAKSI SOSIAL ETNIS CINA-JAWA KOTA SURAKARTA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25077/jantro.v21.n1.p1-9.2019Keywords:
Social Interaction, Chinese Ethnicity, Javanese Ethnicity, Surakarta, ConflictAbstract
Surakarta has a multiethnic and multicultural society. There have been long conflicts that led to forms of discrimination and violence against ethnic Chinese in Surakarta. This conflict resulted in deep trauma for the Surakarta society. Conflict reconciliation is needed so that there is no gap between the society. One of the efforts made is to carry out social interactions. The purpose of this study was to create a scheme of forms of social interaction spread across several fields. This article was prepared using a library study method where the data obtained came from various books, journals, and theses. The results show that the interaction of Chinese and Javanese in Surakarta can be made into a scheme grouped in 8 fields, such as language, education, economics, religion, community activities, arts, marriage, and culture
References
Badan Pekerja Malang Corruption Watch. (2017). Laporan Akhir Tahun 2017. Malang: Malang Corruption Watch.
___________. (2018). Laporan Akhir Tahun 2018. Malang: Malang Corruption Watch.
Banks, J. A. (2017). Failed Citizenship and Transformative Civic Education, Educational Researcher. Vol. 46, No. 7, pp. 366–377. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X17726741.
Bello, A., dan Dola, K. (2014). Sustainable development and the role of local governance: Experience from malaysian model regions. Journal of Humanities and Social Science. Vol 4, No.1, pp. 268-280.
Brackerz, N., dkk. (2005). Main Report Community Consultation And The Hard To Reseacrh: Concept And Practice In Victorian Local Government. Australia: Swinburne Institute for Social Reseacrh.
Chowdhury, F., Desai, S. & Audretsch, D. B. (2018). Corruption, Entrepreneurship, And Social Welfare A Global Perspective. Cham: Springer Nature.
Deliversky, J. (2016). Preventing Corruption In The Education System. Journal Of Educational And Instructional Studies. Vol. 6, No.1.
Fesnic, F. N. (2016). Can civic education make a difference for democracy? Hungary and Poland compared. Political Studies. Vol. 64, No. 4, pp. 966-978. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12215.
Fioramonti, L. and Fiori, A. (2010). “Civil Society after Democracy: The Evolution of Civic Activism in South Africa and Korea.†Journal of Civil Society. Vol. 6, No.1, pp. 23-38.
Gephart, M. (2016). Local embedding of international discourse: Chile and the international and transnational anti-corruption campaign. International Relations. Vol. 30, No.1, pp. 49-77.
Gong, T., dan Wang, S. (2012). Indicators and Implications of Zero Tolerance of Corruption: The Case of Hong Kong. Springer: Social Indicators Research. Vol. 112, No. 3, pp. 569-586.
Indonesia Corruption Watch. (2016). Menyemai Semangat Antikorupsi: Annual Report 2016. Jakarta: ICW.
Isin, F Engin. (2002). City, Democracy and Citizenship: Historical Images, Contemporary Practices. London: Sage Publications Inc.
Jiang, G. (2017). Corruption Control In Postreform China: A Social Censure Perspective. Singapore: Springer Nature.
Kubbe, I. & Engelbert, A. (2018). Corruption And Norms: Why Informal Rules Matter. Cham: Springer Nature.
Lewis, D. (2010). Political ideologies and non-governmental organizations: an anthropological perspective, Journal of Political Ideologies. Vol. 15, No.3, pp. 333-345, DOI: 10.1080/13569317.2010.513877.
Molina-Girón, L. A. (2015). Educating active citizens: what roles are students expected to play in public life?, In Sandi Kawecka Nenga, Jessica K. Taft (Ed) Youth Engagement: The Civic-Political Lives of Children and Youth, Vol. 16 Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 47-72. Doi:10.1108/S1537-4661(2013)0000016007.
Ngozwana, N. A. (2017). Civic education in Lesotho: implications for teaching of democratic citizenship, International Journal of Lifelong Education. Vol. 36, No. 5, pp. 526-540. DOI: 10.1080/02601370.2017.1304460.
Pérez-DÃaz, V. (2014). Civil society: A multi-layered concept, Current Sociology Review. Vol. 62, No. 6, pp. 812–830. DOI: 10.1177/0011392114533115.
Prasetijo, A. (2015). Pergerakan Sosial: Antara Marxian dan Non Marxian, Jurnal Antropologi: Isu-isu Sosial Budaya. Vol. 17, No. 1, pp 65-70.
Puspito, N. T., Elwina S M., Utari, I. S., dan Kurniadi, Y. (2011). Pendidikan Anti Korupsi untuk Perguruan Tinggi. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI.
Quah, J. S.T. (2017). Five success stories in combating corruption: lessons for policy makers. Asian Education and Development Studies. Vol. 6, No.3.
___________. (2017). Singapore's success in combating corruption: lessons for policy makers. Asian Education and Development Studies. Vol. 6, No.3.
Rosikah, C. D., dan Listianingsih, D. M. (2016). Pendidikan antikorupsi: Kajian antikorupsi teori dan praktik. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Saha, S. K. (2014). Corruption and good governance: The case of Bangladesh. Journal of Social Sciences. Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 45-52.
Saleh, K. & Munif. (2015). Membangun Karakter Budaya Politik dalam Demokrasi. Jurnal ADDIN. Vol. 5, No.2, pp. 309-332.
Snow, N. E. (2018). Hope as a democratic civic virtue. Metaphilosophy. Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 407-426. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12299.
Tim Penyusun Laporan KPK. (2018). Laporan Tahunan 2017: Demi Indonesia Untuk Indonesia. Jakarta: Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi.
Transparency International. (2017). Corruption Perspection Index (CPI) 2016. This work from Transparency International.
_____________. (2018). Corruption Perspection Index (CPI) 2017. This work from Transparency International.
Winarno. (2009). Kewarganegaraan Indonesia dari Sosiologi Menuju Yuridis. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Winataputra, U.S. (2012). Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Dalam Perspektif Internasional. Bandung: Widya Aksara Press.
Wong, K. L., Lee, C. K. J., Chan, K. S. J. & Kennedy, K. J. (2016). Constructions of civic education: Hong Kong teachers’ perceptions of moral, civic and national education, Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education. Vol. 47, No. 5, pp. 628-646. DOI: 10.1080/03057925.2016.1262756.
Zed, M. (2008). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author(s) retain the full copyright over all published articles. By submitting and publishing with Jurnal Antropologi: Isu-Isu Sosial Budaya (JANTRO), the author(s) grant the Department of Anthropology FISIP Universitas Andalas (as the publisher) the exclusive right of first publication.
All articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license.. This license permits users to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work, provided the original work and source (JANTRO) are properly cited and any derivative work is shared under the same license.
The author(s) are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive scholarly exchange and earlier citation of published work.
Department of Anthropology FISIP Universitas Andalas has the right to multiply and distribute the article and every author is not allowed to publish the same article that was published in this journal. Thanks to FISIP Universitas Andalasthat was funded this journal sustainability.
The Copyright Notice should describe for readers and authors whether the copyright holder is the author, journal, or a third party. It should include additional licensing agreements (CC BY-NC-SA)
The manuscript authentic and copyright statement submission can be downloaded ON THIS FORM.
Fill out the form and submit via email or fax to the following address:
Office of Editorial Board Jurnal Antropologi: Isu-Isu Sosial Budaya
Department of Anthropology, FISIP, Universitas Andalas
Building B Department 2nd Floor, FISIP, Universitas Andalas, Kampus Limau Manis, Padang, West Sumatra, 25162, Ph. 0751-71266, Fax: 0751-71266
Email: editor_jantro@soc.unand.ac.id
.png)
