Articles

Mitos Gajah: Upaya Damaikan Konflik Gajah – Manusia di Balai Raja Bengkalis

Authors

  1. 1Department of Anthropology, FISIP, Universitas Andalas, West Sumatra 🇮🇩
  2. 2Department of Sociology, FISIP, Universitas Riau, Riau 🇮🇩
Received
October 19, 2021
Revised
November 11, 2021
Accepted
November 15, 2021
Published
December 18, 2021

Abstract

This study discussed the myths of elephants in the community of Balai Raja Village, Pinggir District, Bengkalis Regency. The elephant myths are the patterns of human-elephant relationships. Before the 1980s, the relationship between elephants and humans was very harmonious. After 1980, the forestry and oil palm industries caused between elephants and humans, which has been occurring until now. This study is categorized into qualitative research with an ethnographic design. Researchers stayed in the field for 2 months to explore information in depth through observation and in-depth interviews. The data was analyzed qualitatively and then written in this report. This study has found out that the conflict between elephants and humans is determined by human attitudes and behavior. The myth of the elephant is a symbol of efforts to conserve natural resources and a tool for compliance with societal norms and values. Elephants have protective properties and are very empathetic to babies. This study proposes that elephant mitigation can use a mythical approach by combining elephants’ and human’s habitation. This study contributes to the science of Anthropology, especially about the conservation of animals and nature. This study proposes that elephants should not be called pests, but a chain of human mutualism, where the elephants and humans live in harmony as a unified ecosystem.

Keywords

Balai Raja Landscape; Conservation; Conflict; Elephants; Myth

References

  1. Afiff S. dan Lowe, C. (2007). „Claiming Indigenous Community: Political
  2. Effendi, N. (2014). „Budaya Politik Khas Minangkabau Sebagai Alternatif Budaya
  3. Grossberg, L. (1979). Interpreting the “Crisis†of Culture in Communication
  4. Kotzé, M., Seedat, M., Suffla,S. dan Kramer, S. (2013). „Community conversations as community engagement: hosts‟ reflections‟. South African Journal of
  5. World Health Organization. (2020a). Considerations for quarantine of individuals in the context of containment for coronavirus disease (COVID-19): interim guidance, 19 March 2020. apps.who.int
  6. World Health Organization. (2020b). Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) SituationReport – 146.
  7. Journal articles:
  8. Discourse and Natural Resource Rights in Indonesia‟. Jurnal Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, Vol. 32, No. 1 . DOI: 10.2307/40645203
  9. Theory. Journal of Communication, Vol.:29, Issue:1. Hal.56-68. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1979.tb01682.x
  10. Psychology 43(4) 494–505 DOI: 10.1177/0081246313508353
  11. Parameswaran, R, 2002. „Local Culture in Global Media: Excavating Colonial and Material Discourses in National Geographic‟. Jurnal Communication Theory. Vol.:12, Issue:3, Hal. 287 – 315. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00271.
  12. Aarne Poisto & Hamed Alavi (2016). Abuse of Dominant Market Position by Predatory Pricing; The Valio Case. Hasanuddin Law Review, 2(1), 24-37. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10. 20956/halrev.v1n1.212
  13. Youngelson-Neal, H., Neal, A. G., dan Fried, J. 2001. „Global and Local Culture in the 21st Century. The Journal of American Culture Vol.:24 Issue:3-4.Hal. 31 – 36. DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-4726.2001.2403_31.x
  14. World Wide Web:
  15. Gugus Tugas Percepatan Penanganan Covid-19. (2020). Situasi virus COVID-19 di Indonesia. https://covid19.go.id/peta-sebaran
  16. https://suaramerdeka.news/kearifan-lokal-dalam-masa-pandemi/ https://prokabar.com/wagub-sumbar-gelar-diskusi-dengan-ninik-mamak-inipembahasannya/
  17. https://ksp.go.id/kearifan-lokal-masyarakat-cegah-penyebaran-covid-19/index.html

Author Biography

Fajar Ramadhan

Magister Sosiologi Fisipol Unri