Articles

Culture and Food Security of The Mowewe Community During The Covid-19 Pandemic

Authors

  • La Ode Topo Jers1Corresponding Author,
  • Erens Elvianus Koodoh1,
  • Hasniah Hasniah1,
  • Abdul Jalil1,
  • La Ode Muhammad Ruspan Takasi2,
  • Alias Alias1,
  • I Kadek Sindu1
  1. 1Faculty of Cultural Science, Universitas Halu Oleo, Kendari 🇮🇩
  2. 2Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Terbuka, Kendari 🇮🇩
Received
September 16, 2021
Revised
December 8, 2021
Accepted
December 13, 2021
Published
December 18, 2021

Abstract

Food is a critical aspect of community resilience. The Covid-19 pandemic, however, has affected the natural environment, making food supply scarce and ultimately impacting economic and national stability. Despite this, the Mowewe community shares a local culture by which its people get empowered to maintain food security. Therefore, this study aims to discover and describe the local community's culture in Mowewe District in establishing a food security system. The method used was ethnography with a qualitative approach. Data were collected through participant observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation, after which the data were analyzed using qualitative descriptive techniques. The findings revealed that the local culture of the Mowewe community was built upon the concept of Mekambare, principles of gotong royong (cooperation), and ecological adaptation. The Mowewe community was of deep concern for the pattern of life balance during the pandemic. They took advantage of natural resources by clearing agricultural land to grow rice, corn, patchouli, and sago and keeping bees in the forest to produce honey for an additional source of income and immunity

Keywords

Culture; food security; ecology; cooperation; local

References

  1. Aneas, M. A., & Sandín, M. P. (2009). Intercultural and Cross-Cultural Communication Research: Some Reflections about Culture and Qualitative Methods. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, Vol. 10, No. 1.
  2. Brownlie, S. (2018). Using cultural categories for opposition and brokering in conflict mediation. Language and Intercultural Communication, 90-106.
  3. Darquennes, J. (2015). Language research conflict: A state of the art. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, No. 235, 7-32.
  4. Davidovitch, N., & Khyzhniak, K. (2018). Language Personality in the Conditions of Cross-Cultural Communication: Case-Study Experience. International Education Studies, Vol. 11, No. 2, 13-26.
  5. Elias, A. (2020, January 13). Academia. Retrieved May 15, 2021, from Academia.edu: https://www.academia.edu/41617929/Are_the_Central_Flores_languages_really_typologically_unusual
  6. Forth, G. (2018). Sex Differentiable Terms in Languages. Oceanic Linguistics, Volume 57, Number 1, 101-122.
  7. Gudykunst, W. B., & Mody, B. (2001). Handbook of International and Intercultural Communication 2nd Edition. London: Sage Publication.
  8. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (n.d.). Retrieved May 17, 2021, from Bahasa dan Peta Bahasa di Indonesia: https://petabahasa.kemdikbud.go.id/provinsi.php?idp=Nusa%20Tenggara%20Timur
  9. Lemmouh, Z. (2017). A Critical Linguistic analysis of the representation of Muslims in the New York Times. Journal of Language and Communication Studies, 217-240.