Articles

Reconstructing Gender Roles in Siri' na Pacce Culture in the Modern Era: Challenges and Opportunities

Authors

  1. 1Universitas Negeri Makassar 🇮🇩
  2. 2Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia 🇮🇩
Received
March 26, 2024
Revised
November 8, 2024
Accepted
December 7, 2024
Published
December 22, 2024

Abstract

This article examines the changes and reconstruction of gender roles in Siri’ na Pacceculture, a tradition rich in cultural and social values, in the modern era. The research employs a qualitative approach using observation, interview and content analysis techniques to gain an in-depth understanding of how gender roles in Siri’ na Pacce Culture have transformed, as well as the challenges and opportunities it faces in the modern era. The results show that Siri’ na Pacce culture has undergone a process of gender role reconstruction influenced by various factors, including globalization, modernization, and evolving social dynamics. Although there have been significant changes in gender perceptions and practices, the tradition also faces challenges in maintaining its cultural values and norms amidst modernization. The study also identifies new opportunities that have emerged in the reconstruction of gender roles in Siri’ na Pacce culture, such as women’s active participation in traditional activities that were previously considered male-dominated, as well as the adoption of more inclusive and egalitarian gender values in society. As such, this article makes an important contribution to the understanding of the dynamics of gender roles in Siri’ na Pacce culture in the modern era, as well as highlighting the challenges and opportunities faced in the reconstruction process. The implications of these findings can guide efforts to preserve and develop sustainable and inclusive local cultures in the future.

Keywords

Culture; Gender Dynamics; Gender Roles; Siri’ na Pacce; Reconstruction

References

  1. Apiem, Endemina, Merry. (2021). Makna Arrarem sebagai Pendampingan Pastoral dalam Perkawinan Etnik Biak di Propinsi Papua. Anthropos; Jurnal Antropologi Sosial dan Budaya, 7(1), 131-137. DOI: 10.24114/antro.v7i1.24914
  2. Denzin, K. Norman & Lincoln, S.Yvonna.(2009). HandBook Of Qualitative Research. Yogyakarta; Pustaka Pelajar
  3. Dillistone, F.W. (2002). Daya Kekuatan Simbol,“The Power Of Symbolsâ€, Yogyakarta, Kanisius.
  4. Geertz, Clifford. (1992). Tafsir Kebudayaan. Yogyakarta; Kanisius
  5. Hastuti, Hepi., Maswati, Rani. (2021). Proses Komunikasi Simbolik Adat Mas Kawin di Kampung Wayori Distrik Supiori Barat Kabupaten Supiori. Jurnal Sosialisasi; Jurnal Hasil pemikiran, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan Keilmuan Sosiologi Pendidikan. 8(2), 201-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/sosialisasi.v1i1.23905
  6. Jenks, Chris. (2013). Cultur, Studi Kebudayaan. Yogyakarta; Pustaka Pelajar
  7. Koentjaraningrat. (1984). Kamus Antropologi. Jakarta; Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa.
  8. Levi, Strauss, Claude. (1997). Mitos, Dukun dan Sihir. Yogyakarta; Kanisius
  9. MR, M, Husen., Hamdani., & R. candrasari. (2022). Tradisi dan Status Sosial dalam Penetapan Mahar Perkawinan di Gampong Mamplam Aceh Utara. JSPM; Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Pulitik Malikussaleh, 3(1), 32-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2910/jspm.v3i1.6224
  10. Nuhuyanan, Fatima., et.al. (2022). Potret Tradisi Bib Maaf pada Keberangkatan Haji Masyarakat Desa Dullah Laut Kepulauan Kei Maluku Tenggara. Jurnal Potret Pemikiran, 26(2), 191-212. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.30984/pp.v26i2.2082
  11. Pandu,Yafet, Kala., & Suwarsono. (2020). Kajian Etnomatematika Terhadap Moko Sebagai Mas Kawin(Belis) Pada Perkawinan Adat Masyarakat Alorâ€. Asimtot: Jurnal Kependidikan Matematika. 2 (2). 115-127. 2020. https://doi.org/10.30822/asimtot.v2i2.768
  12. Roucek, J. S., Simamora, S., & Warren, R. L. (1984). Pengantar sosiologi. Jakarta; PT. Bina Aksara.
  13. Ritzer George dan Goodman J. Douglas. (2011). Teori Sosiologi Modern. Jakarta; Kencana Prenada Media Group.
  14. Sairin, Sjafri., et.al. (2002). Pengantar Sosiologi Ekonomi. Yogyakarta; Pustaka Pelajar
  15. Soepomo, R. (2007). Bab-Bab Tentang Hukum Adat. Jakarta : Pradnya Paramita.
  16. Suroh, Siti. (2021). Pemberian Mahar dan Uang Hantaran pada Pernikahan Adat Suku Rejang Bengkulu Utara (Prespektif Sosiologi Agama). Manthiq; Jurnal Filsafat Agama dan Pemikiran Islam, 6(1) 1-6. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.29300/mtq.v6i1.5178
  17. Turner S. Bryan. (2012). Teori Sosial Dari Klasik Sampai Postmodern. Yogyakarta; Pustaka Pelajar.
  18. Usman, La. (2018). Fungsi Pembayaran Mas kawin pada Komunitas Kampung Skouw Sae, Kota Jayapura. Jurnal Arkeologi Papua. 10(1). 17-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24832/papua.v10i1.239
  19. Winangun, Wartaya Y.W. (1990). Masyarakat Bebas Struktur. Liminalitas dan Komunitas Menurut Victor Turner. Yogyakarta; Kanisius.
  20. Yusuf, Muhamad., Bugis, Andi., Iribaram, Suparto., Pratiwi, Dyan. (2020). The Rise Of Children Dropping Out Of School In Raja Ampat. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan. 12(2). 270-287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v12.i2.225