Achievement of ODF (Open Defecation Free) Villages Through the Social Functions Approach In Teba Village

Authors

  • yuni ratnasari Lampung University
  • Tria Fadilla FISIP, Universitas Lampung, Indonesia.
  • Suwaib Amiruddin FISIP, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25077/jantro.v25.n1.p21-33.2023

Keywords:

Social Function, Achievement, Sanitation, ODF

Abstract

Public behavior of open defecation free (ODF) is an unhealthy condition. The program through ownership of healthy latrines is presented as a means of educating the public about healthy living. The research aims to determine the social structures in achieving ODF (Open Defecation Free) villages. This study uses qualitative methods with the aim of seeing the location first hand and conducting interviews for the individuals and groups involved. The results of the study show that the ODF program involves several components including the company, government and community. The function of the community is to form groups for sanitation socialization, while the company participates in building both latrines and clean water facilities. Meanwhile, Pekon Teba also provides facilities, in accordance with government programs that have been planned, both in terms of budget and additional facilities. The facilities and infrastructure provided to the community include repairing waterways by establishing a Clean Water Facilities Management Agency (BPSAB) together with YKWS and PT. Tirta Investama while from a budget perspective it is fully supported by CSR PT. Tirta Investama and policies in the form of sanctions limit access to public services for residents who are reluctant or refuse to build healthy latrines in their respective homes.

References

Akmal, Z. (2021). Eksistensi Masyarakat Adat Dalam Undang-Undang Terkait Lingkungan Hidup. Jurnal Industri dan Perkotaan, XVII(1), 27–35.

Apriando, T. (2019). Apa Kabar Penanganan Kasus Pembakaran Tenda Petani Kendeng? Mongabay. https://www.mongabay.co.id/2019/02/16/apa-kabar-penanganan-kasus-pembakaran-tenda-petani-kendeng/

Asriwijaya, E. (2020). Gerakan Ekopopulisme Komunitas Samin Melawan Perusahaan Semen di Pegunungan Kendeng. Jurnal Sosiologi Pendidikan Humanis, 5(1), 35–47.

BBC Indonesia. (2016). Tolak pembangunan pabrik semen, sembilan perempuan cor kaki. BBC Indonesia. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/berita_indonesia/2016/04/160413_indonesia_protes_semen_istana

Gandhawangi, S. (2022). Ajaran Komunitas Samin Masih Relevan hingga Kini. Kompas.id.

Haba, J. (2010). Realitas Masyarakat Adat di Indonesia: Sebuah Refleksi. PMB-LIPI, 12(2), 255–276.

Harnanto, R. A., Ummah, A. I., Rekavianti, E., & Ratnasari, A. (2018). Gerakan Masyarakat Kendeng, Rembang untuk Keadilan dan Penegakan Hak Asasi Manusia. JSW (Jurnal Sosiologi Walisongo), 2(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.21580/jsw.2018.2.1.2270

Komnas Perempuan. (2019). Isu HAM Perempuan dalam Konflik Pertambangan: Rencana/Pembangunan Pabrik Semen di Pengunungan Kendeng Jawa Tengah.

Kresna, M. (2017). Gubernur Ganjar Lagi-Lagi Terbitkan Izin Baru Semen Rembang. Tirto.id.

Matanasi, P. (2017). Cara Samin Melawan dan Membikin Resah Belanda. Tirto.id. https://tirto.id/cara-samin-melawan-dan-membikin-resah-belanda-clqN

Mies, M. (1994). The Need for a New Vision: the Subsistence Perspective. In Ecofeminism (hal. 297–321). Zed Books.

Mies, M. (2014a). Feminist Research: Science, Violence and Responsility. In Ecofeminism (hal. 36). Zed Books.

Mies, M. (2014b). Liberating the Consumer. In Ecofeminism (hal. 251–263). Zed Books.

Mutmainnah & Demadevina, N. (2020). Outlook HuMa: Sikap Pemerintah dan DPR dalam Legislasi Nasional Terkait Hak Masyarakat Adat di Tahun 2020. Jakarta: Perkumpulan Huma Infonesia

Pembaharua Agraria dan Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam, (2001).

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 41 Tahun 1999 Tentang Kehutanan, Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia 1 (1999).

Nugraha, I. (2018). Bercermin dari Kasus Kendeng, Sulitnya Warga Peroleh Keadilan Lingkungan. Mangobay. https://www.mongabay.co.id/2018/02/16/bercermin-dari-kasus-kendeng-sulitnya-warga-peroleh-keadilan-lingkungan/

Ramadayanti, E. (2021). Upaya Perlindungan Hak Masyarakat Adat setelah Satu Dasawarsa Program MIFEE(Merauke Integrated Food and Energy Estate)Melalui Citizen Law Suit. Padjadjaran Law Review, 9(1), 1–20.

Rosidi. (2017). Berebut berkah dari pegunungan Kendeng. Lokadata. https://lokadata.id/artikel/berebut-berkah-dari-pegunungan-kendeng

Scully, P. (2010). Should we give up on the State? Feminist theory, African gender history and transitional justice*. African Journal on Conflict Resolution, 9(2), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajcr.v9i2.52171

Shiva, V. (1988a). Development, Ecology and Women. In Staying Alive: Women, Ecology and Survival in India (hal. 1–13). Zed Books.

Shiva, V. (1988b). Science, Nature, and Gender. In Staying Alive: Women, Ecology and Survival in India (hal. 14–37). Zed Books.

Shiva, V. (1988c). Staying Alive: Women, Ecology and Survival in India. Zed Books.

Shiva, V. (2014a). Homeless in the “Global Village.†In Ecofeminism (hal. 98–107). Zed Books.

Shiva, V. (2014b). Masculinization of the Motherland. In Ecofeminism (hal. 108–114). Zed Books.

Shiva, V. (2014c). Preface to the critique influence change edition. In Ecofeminism (2nd ed.). Zed Books.

Shiva, V. (2016a). Biodiversity and People’s Knowledge. In Biopracy: The Plunder of Nature and Knowlede (hal. 78–96). North Atlantic Books.

Shiva, V. (2016b). The Political and Cultural Cost of the Green Revollution. In The Violence of the Green Revolution: Third World Agriculture, Ecology and Politics (hal. 176–199). University Press of Kentucky.

Sinuko, D. (2016). Massa Pendukung Pabrik Semen Gelar Aksi di Kantor Ganjar. CNN Indonesia. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20161213143715-20-179266/massa-pendukung-pabrik-semen-gelar-aksi-di-kantor-ganjar

Subarudi. (2013). Dampak Putusan MK No. 35/PUU-X/2012 terhadap Pengurusan dan Pengelolaan Hutan. Policy Brief, 7(2), 1–8.

Subekti, T. (2016). Konflik Samin vs PT. Semen Indonesia. Jurnal Transformative, 2(2), 189–202. https://transformative.ub.ac.id/index.php/jtr/article/view/136

Sukirno. (2011). Politik Hukum Pengakuan Negara terhadap Masyarakat Hukum Adat dan Hak-Hak Tradisionalnya. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.40.3.2011.375-383

Sulaiman, S., Adli, M., & Mansur, T. M. (2019). Ketidakteraturan Hukum Pengakuan Dan Perlindungan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Di Indonesia. Law Reform, 15(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v15i1.23352

Syamsudin, S. (2008). Beban Masyarakat Adat Menghadapi Hukum Negara. Jurnal Hukum UII Yogyaata, 15(3), 338–351. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol15.iss3.art9

Tempo.co. (2015). Begini Kejanggalan Amdal PT Semen Indonesia di Rembang. Tempo.co. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/701899/begini-kejanggalan-amdal-pt-semen-indonesia-di-rembang?page_num=1

Tempo.co. (2016). Pegunungan Kendeng Seharusnya Lumbung Padi, Bukan Tambang. Tempo.co.

Widhana, D. H. (2017). Di Balik Hasil KLHS Tahap I untuk Konflik Semen Rembang. Tirto.id.

Wulansari, I., & Sigit, R. R. (2017). Kendeng dan Gerakan Ekofeminisme. Mongabay.

Virgy, M.A., Putri, A., Naufal, F.A., & Wardhana, A. (2021). Madani Insight: Menakar Perkembangan RUU Masyarakat Hukum Adat. Jakarta: Yayasan Madani Berkelanjutan

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

ratnasari, yuni, Fadilla, T., & Amiruddin, S. (2023). Achievement of ODF (Open Defecation Free) Villages Through the Social Functions Approach In Teba Village. Jurnal Antropologi: Isu-Isu Sosial Budaya, 25(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.25077/jantro.v25.n1.p21-33.2023

Issue

Section

Articles