IDENTIFIKASI FAKTOR PENDORONG ANAK PEREMPUAN BERAKTIVITAS DI JALANAN (Suatu Studi Terhadap Anak Jalanan Perempuan di Kota Pekanbaru)

Authors

  • Basri Basri Department of Sociology, FISIP, Universitas Riau
  • Yoserizal Yoserizal Department of Sociology, FISIP, Universitas Riau

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25077/jantro.v21.n1.p81-91.2019

Keywords:

Causative factors, street children, women, Pekanbaru

Abstract

In Pekanbaru City, more and more female street children are found. They used to roam the crossroads, at the "red light" intersection, on pedestrian bridges, in the shops, and in shopping centers. To anticipate the existence of female street children in Pekanbaru City, the Pekanbaru Social Service as an agency that has authority in handling female street children, has recruited these female street children and returned them to their home areas and to their parents' homes. However, the existence of female street children in the city of Pekanbaru remains a daily sight and in fact, some of them are old faces that have been repatriated. The research objective was first, to identify the social and cultural characteristics of female street children in Pekanbaru City. Second, comprehensively analyze the factors that cause girls to move on the streets. The research method is quantitative descriptive. The population in this study were all female street children in Pekanbaru. From this population, a list of all female street children will be created. From the number, the sample will be taken by simple random sampling. The results of the study showed that out of 115 street children the respondents were aged 4 to 18 years and the most aged between 12 and 14 years (45.22%). Seeing the age of street children who have school age, it turns out that 69.57 percent are not in school. While those who were still in school the education level (74.26%) had elementary school education and (25.74%) were in junior high school. The dominant reason done by street children originating from within themselves is on their own desires and that desire arises because of the economic conditions of the family. It seems that the reasons they put forward on their own are (59.13%) with the aim of helping parents (37.39 %) helps school fees 23.48 percent to find food (21.74%).

References

Judistira, K.G. (2008). Budaya Sunda: Melintasi Waktu Menentang Masa Depan. Bandung: Lemlit UNPAD.

Koentjaraningrat. (2009). Sejarah Teori Antropologi I. Jakarta: UI Press.

Lubis, B.Z. (2008). “Potensi Budaya dan Kearifan Lokal Sebagai Modal Dasar Membangun Jati Diri Bangsaâ€. Jurnal Ilmu- Ilmu Sosial. “vol†9, (3), 339-346.

Machfiroh, R. (2011). Revitalisasi Karakter Bangsa Melalui Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan dengan Pengembangan Budaya lokal (Studi Kasus Budaya Macapat di Masyarakat Kota Surakarta Jawa Tengah).Tesis Magister pada SPS UPI Bandung: Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Marzuqi, Moh. (2009). Akulturasi Islam dan Budaya Jawa (Studi terhadap Praktek “Laku Spiritual†Kadang Padepokan Gunung Lanang di Desa Sindutan Kecamatan Temon Kabupaten Kulon Progo). Yogyakarta: UIN Sunan Kalijaga

Nugroho, Arief Budi dan Valentina W.S. (2010). Akulturasi Antara Etnis Cina dan Jawa: Konvergensi atau Divergensi Ujaran Penutur Bahasa Jawa?. Seminar Nasional Pemertahanan Bahasa Nusantara. Magister Linguistik PPs UNDIP Semarang.

Prasetyawan, Widi Agung. (2010). Akulturasi Budaya Islam dan Budaya Hindu: Studi tentang Perilaku Keagamaan Masyarakat Islam di Gununggangsir Beji Pasuruan. Surabaya: UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya.

Rodzik, Ali Abdul. (2008). Akulturasi Budaya Betawi dengan Tionghoa (Studi Komunikasi Antarbudaya pada Kesenian Gambang Kromong di Perkampungan Budaya Betawi, Kelurahan Srengseng Sawah. Jakarta: UIN Syarif Hidayatullah

Saebani, Beni Ahmad. (2012). Pengantar Antropolog. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

Santosa, Budi dan Irma Winingsih. (2013). Integrasi Multikultural dalam Multietnis: Strategi Akulturasi Masyarakat Etnis Jawa, Cina dan Arab Keturunan di Wilayah Semarang. Semarang: Universitas Dian Nuswantoro.

Santosa, R. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Kebahasaan. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Spradley, J.P. (2007). Metode Etnografi (Edisi terjemahan Bahasa Indonesia oleh Amri Marzali). Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.

Suwarna, dkk. (2013). Akulturasi Kultural Jawa dan Sumatra dalam Penguatan Proses Integrasi Nasional. Yogyakarta: Uiversitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2019-06-12

How to Cite

Basri, B., & Yoserizal, Y. (2019). IDENTIFIKASI FAKTOR PENDORONG ANAK PEREMPUAN BERAKTIVITAS DI JALANAN (Suatu Studi Terhadap Anak Jalanan Perempuan di Kota Pekanbaru). Jurnal Antropologi: Isu-Isu Sosial Budaya, 21(1), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.25077/jantro.v21.n1.p81-91.2019

Issue

Section

Articles