Model Pariwisata Berbasis Tri Hita Karana: Studi Kasus Pengelolaan Kawasan Luar Pura Uluwatu, Desa Pecatu, Bali

Authors

  • Ida Bagus Gde Pujaastawa Departement of Anthropology, Faculty of Humanities, Udayana University, Bali
  • I Putu Sudana Faculty of Tourism, Universitas Udayana, Bali.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25077/jantro.v24.n1.p70-80.2022

Keywords:

Tri Hita Karana, tourism, management, model, tourist attraction.

Abstract

This study tries to examine the management model of Kawasan Luar Pura Uluwatu Tourist attraction in Pecatu Village, Bali, one of the popular tourist attractions and is considered to have implications that lead to increasing economic welfare, cultural and environmental sustainability. The purpose of this research is to formulate a tourism attraction management model based on Tri Hita Karana as an alternative model for sustainable tourism development. This research was conducted using an ethnographic approach as a variant of the qualitative approach. Data was collected by using interviews, observation, literature, and document inspection techniques. The findings of this study state that the Tri Hita Karana-based tourist attraction management model makes the three environmental aspects (spiritual, social, and physical) objects as well as subjects of tourism development. In their position as objects, aspects of parhyangan, pawongan, and palemahan function as potential tourist attractions. On the other hand, as a subject, the values of Tri Hita Karana serve as a reference as well as control tourism development policies. This model carries a number of implications in the form of increasing economic welfare, and cultural and environmental sustainability in a sustainable manner.

Author Biography

Ida Bagus Gde Pujaastawa, Departement of Anthropology, Faculty of Humanities, Udayana University, Bali

Ida Bagus Gde Pujaastawa, was born in Denpasar, November 18, 1962. A permanent lecturer in Departement of Anthropology Faculty of Arts, Udayana University, also lecturer  in postgraduate Programs in S-2 Cultural Studies and S3 Environmental Sciences, and S-2 and S-3 Tourism in Udayana University. Actively researching, writing articles, books, and as a speaker on socio-cultural and tourism issues at various scientific meetings. Mobile: 08123835156. E-mail: ibg_pujaastawa@yahoo.co.id.

References

Alfirdaus, L. K. (2018). Dari identitas ke ideologi: Penguatan arah kebijakan programatik partai politik. 3(2), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.14710/jiip.v3i2.3886

Arditama, E. (2016). Mengkaji Ruang Publik dari Perspektif Kuasa: Fenomena Kemenangan Aktor Hegemonik Melalui Dominasi Budaya. 1(1), 69–86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/jpi.v1i1.9181

Armini, G. A. (2017). Toleransi Masyarakat Multi Etnis Dan Multiagama Dalam Organisasi Subak Di Bali. Patanjala : Jurnal Penelitian Sejarah Dan Budaya, 5(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.30959/patanjala.v5i1.152

Best, H. (2011). The elite-population gap in the formation of political identities. A cross-cultural investigation. Europe - Asia Studies, 63(6), 995–1009. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2011.585751

Brochta, W. O. (2020). Ethnic diversity in central government cabinets Ethnic diversity in central government cabinets. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 0(0), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2020.1756360

Causadias, J. M. (2020). What is culture? Systems of people, places, and practices. Applied Developmental Science, 0(0), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2020.1789360

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage publications.

Dahzuki, A. I. S., Priyatama, A. N., & Kusumawati, R. N. (2018). Hubungan Culture Intelligence dengan Organizational Citizenship Behavior melalui Kepemimpinan Transformasional. 6(2).

Darwis. (2011). Elit Politik Lokal dalam Konflik Ibukota di Kabupaten Morowali. Universitas Tadulako, Palu, 51, 300–321.

https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.18196/jgp.2011.0016

Efriza. (2019). Eksistensi Partai Politik Dalam Persepsi Publik. 10(1), 17–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22212/jp.v10i1.1314

Engelstad, F. (2017). A power elite in the cultural field. A story of Norwegian neo-corporatism. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 23(5), 527–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2015.1084297

Georgetown, U., Informa, R., Terdaftar, W. N., House, M., & Street, M. (2010). PEMBUATAN KASUS UNTUK AGAMA KEBEBASAN DALAM ISLAM TRADISI. University of Notre Dame, 37–41.

Hannah, M. G. (2013). Attention And The Phenomenological Politics Of Landscape. Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography, 95(3), 235–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/geob.12023

Hofstede, G. (1983). National Cultures in Four Dimensions: A Research-Based Theory of Cultural Differences among Nations. International Studies of Management & Organization, 13(1–2), 46–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.1983.11656358

Kristianus, K. (2016). Politik dan Strategi Budaya Etnik dalam Pilkada Serentak di Kalimantan Barat. Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review, 1(1), 87. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpi.v1i1.9182

McDonnell, J., & Taylor, P. J. (2014). Value Creation in Political Exchanges: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Political Marketing, 13(3), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2014.929884

Mohamed, E. H., & Rostam, K. (2017). Globalisasi Dan Impak Sosiobudaya. Jurnal Antropologi: Isu-Isu Sosial Budaya, 19(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.25077/jantro.v19i1.68

Nesbitt, G. (2014). The social value of culture: learning from revolutionary Cuba. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 20(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2012.751986

Robyn. (2014). Spektrum Sosiologis : Asosiasi Sosiologis CIVIC DAN KEGIATAN AGAMA : MENJELAJAHI. November, 37–41.

Romli, L. (2019). Political Identity and Challenges for Democracy Consolidation in Indonesia. 4(January), 78–98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/ipsr.v4i1.17214

Ruksin, R. U. (2018). Institusi Minoritas Dan Struktur Sosial Di India. Harmoni, 17(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.32488/harmoni.v17i1.289

Sari, I. P. (2018). Hermoni dalam Kebhinekaan (Kearifan Lokal Masyarakat Pulau Enggano Provinsi Bengkulu Dalam Mengatasi Konflik). Jurnal Antropologi: Isu-Isu Sosial Budaya, 19(2), 139. https://doi.org/10.25077/jaisb.v19.n2.p139-147.2017

Seiyefa, E. (2017). Elite Political Culture—A Link to Political Violence: Evidence from Nigeria. African Security, 10(2), 103–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392206.2017.1305860

Tanasaldy, T. (2014). Politik Identitas Ethnis di Kalimantan Barat. University of Tasmania.

Vara, R., & Patel, N. (2012). Working with Interpreters in Qualitative Psychological Research: Methodological and Ethical Issues. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 9(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2012.630830

Winarna, J., & Murni, S. (2007). PENGARUH PERSONAL BACKGROUND , POLITICAL BACKGROUND DAN PENGETAHUAN DEWAN TENTANG PENGAWASAN KEUANGAN DAERAH. BISNIS DAN AKUNTANSI, 9(2), 136–152.

Yusdianto, Y. (2015). Hubungan Kewenangan Pusat dan Daerah Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah. PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law), 2(3), 483–504. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v2n3.a4

Yusrialis. (2012). Budaya Birokrasi Pemerintah (Keperihatinan dan Harapan). 9(1), 81–108.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-05

How to Cite

Pujaastawa, I. B. G., & Sudana, I. P. (2022). Model Pariwisata Berbasis Tri Hita Karana: Studi Kasus Pengelolaan Kawasan Luar Pura Uluwatu, Desa Pecatu, Bali. Jurnal Antropologi: Isu-Isu Sosial Budaya, 24(1), 70–80. https://doi.org/10.25077/jantro.v24.n1.p70-80.2022

Issue

Section

Articles