NEGOTIATION BETWEEN STAKEHOLDERS OF COMMODIFICATION: Roles and Impacts as Stakeholders in Tebing Breksi Prambanan

DOI https://doi.org/10.25077/jantro.v21.n1.p111-120.2019
Author(s)
Bayu Pamungkas (Sebelas Maret University) Orcid ID
Warto Warto (Sebelas Maret University)
Mugijatna Mugijatna (Sebelas Maret University)
Abstract

Commodification practice always deals with 3 parties, which our society, government, and private institution. Considered as cultural preservation, Tebing Breksi becomes an object of commodification in Sambirejo Prambanan since 2014. Its commodification arises several conflicts among its stakeholders due to each stakeholder has their own importance and interest. Compared to other commodification practices, bottom-up tourism management is applied that making the commodification of Tebing Breksi differs to others. This research is remarkable dealing with its findings that differenciate the commodification practice between society and government or private institution. This research aims to find the implication of commodification for tourism field using bottom-up tourism management. Whereas, the main purpose of this research is to describe the negotiation between stakeholders of commodification in Tebing Breksi. The method of this research is ethnography by applying in-depth reporting. The findings of this research prove that negotiation between stakeholders of commodification is the impact of a different way of thinking as well as the group’s interest in each stakeholder. Nevertheless, the changes happen among society in Tebing Breksi confirmed Tebing Breksi as an alternative tourism attraction in Prambanan.

Keywords
Commodification Practice; Cultural Preservation; Tebing Breksi; Bottom-up Tourism Management, Stakeholders of Commodification
Klik untuk membaca artikel penuh
Pdf
References

AWH. (2017). “Taman Tebing Breksi Destinasi Favorit”. Kedaulatan Rakyat, 27 Mei 2017.

BPCB Gorontalo. (2014). “Undang-undang No. 11 Tahun 2010 tentang Cagar Budaya”. Retrieved from https://kebudayaan.kemdikbud.go.id on June 2018.

BPHN. (2015). “Undang-undang Republik Indonesia No. 9 Tahun 2015 tentang Pemerintah Daerah”. Retrieved from https://bphn.go.id/data/15uu009/ on June 2018

Bui, H.T., & Lee, T.J. (2015). “Commodification and Politicization of Heritage: Implications for Heritage Tourism at The Imperial Citadel of Thang Long, Hanoi (Vietnam)”. ASEAS – Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, VOL. 8 (2), 187-202. Austria.

Djamal, M. (2015). Paradigma Penelitian Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Emzir. (2009). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan: Kuantitatif dan Kualitatifi. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Guelke, Karoline. (2018). Tourism in an Andean Community: Negotiating Inequality, Gender, and Change. USA: University of Victoria.

Han, G.S. (2016). “Funeral Capitalism: Commodification and Digital Marketing of Funeral Services in Contemporary Korea”. Korean Studies, Vol. 40, 2016: pp. 58-77. Seoul, South Korea.

Kaewkhunok, Suppawit. (2018). “The Commodification of Culture: Bhutan’s Tourism in Globalisation Context.” Thammasat Review, Vol 21. 2018: pp. 152-164. India.

Liedwij, B. V. (2013). Community-Based Tourism: Local Participation and Perceived Impacts. Netherlands: Radboud University Nijmegen.

Mohajan, Haradhan. (2018). “Qualitative Research Methodology in Social Sciences and Related Subjects”. Journal of Economic Development, Environment, and People. Vol.7, pp. 23-48. Bangladesh.

Miswanto, & Safaat, M. (2018). “Dampak Pembangunan Industri Pariwisata Terhadap Alih Fungsi Lahan”. Jurnal Antropologi: Isu-isu Sosial Budaya. Vol. 20 (1): 445-55. Padang.

Mousavi, S.S. et al. (2016). “Defining Cultural Tourism”. In International Conference on Civil, Architecture and Sustainable Development (CASD-2016). Dec. 1-2, 2016. London (UK).

Pallavicini, J.A.C. (2017). “Factors Influencing Tourism Destination Attractiveness: The Case of Malaga.” In International Conference on Planning, Environment, Territories (PLANET EUROPE). June 14th, 2017. Malaga.

Sujarwani, dkk. (2018). “Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Komunitas Adat terpencil (KAT) Oleh Pemerintah Kabupaten Lingga, Kepulauan Riau”. Jurnal Antropologi: Isu-isu Sosial Budaya. Vol. 20 (1): 17-31. Padang.

Trzmielak, D, M. (2013). Commercialization of Research Results: Cooperation Between Science and Business. Lodz: University of Lodz.

Waskito, A. (2013). “Dampak Investasi Asing terhadap Kehidupan Sosial Ekonomi Masyarakat di Kepulauan Derawan”. eJournal Hubungan Internasional, no. 1(1), hlm. 15-24. Samarinda.

Widyastuti, D. A. R. (2011). “Komodifikasi Upacara dan Religi dalam Pemasaran Pariwisata”. Jurnal Komunikasi, no. 2 (1). hlm. 197-208. Yogyakarta.

Yin, R.K. (2009). Qualitative Research: Case Study Research (4th Ed.). London, UK: Sage Publishing.

Yoserizal, & Yesi. (2017). “Conflict of Interest Among Stakeholders in Tesso Nilo National Park (TNNP)”. Jurnal Antropologi: Isu-isu Sosial Budaya. Vol. 19(2): 101-107. Padang.

StatisticsStatistik Artikel

Artikel ini sudah dibaca : 663 kali
Dokumen Pdf sudah dibaca/diunduh : 0 kali