ANALYSIS OF POVERTY IN FOREST SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES BY SUSTAINABLE LIVELIHOOD APPROACH

Author(s)
Rita Parmawati (Postgraduate, Brawijaya University.)
Soemarno Soemarno (Agriculture Faculty, Brawijaya University.)
Maryunani Maryunani (Economy Faculty, Brawijaya University. Veteran Street, Malang)
Agung Sih Kurnianto (Public Health Faculty, Bakti Indonesia University)
Abstract

Poverty in forests surrounding communities shows a contrast between wealth of forest resources and poverty. The poverty of forests surrounding communities is seen as inefficient development to rural needs in general and forest management in particular. This study aims to analyze the factors affecting poverty, the relevance and Sustainable Livelihood Approach in poverty. This research was conducted in Argosari Village, Jabung Subdistrict and Mentaraman Village, Donomulyo District, Malang Regency. Sustainable livelihood approach is applied which adapted on five elements: human, natural, physical, social and financial asset. The sample was determined by proportional random sampling method. Participatory Rapid Appraisal (PRA) were used in this study. Quantitative approach in this study using descriptive analysis and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Poverti Gap 2 indicator (the number of family member) has the greatest contribution to Argosari poverty. The High Consumption 3 indicator (the number of new clothing in a year that can be bought) has the smallest contribution. Significantly, eight indicators have established in Mentaraman, which is indicated by a p-value less than 5% (0.05). Based on the size of the standardize coefficient, it is found that the Poverti Gap 2 indicator (the number of family member) has the greatest contribution to Mentaraman  poverty.

 

Keywords : Argosari, Forest, Mentaraman, Poverty, SLA

 

Keywords
Argosari; Forest; Mentaraman; Poverty; SLA
Klik untuk membaca artikel penuh
Pdf
References

Angelsen, A. & Wunder, S. (2003) . Exploring the Forest-Poverty Link. CIFOR Occasional Paper, 40, 1-20.

Apata, T. G., Apata, O. M., Igbalajobi, O. A. & Awoniyi, S. M. O. (2010). Determinants of rural poverty in Nigeria: Evidence from small holder farmers in South-western, Nigeria. Academic Journals. Journal of Science and Technology Education Research, 1, 85 – 91.

Asaah, E.K., Tchoundjeu, Z. , Leakey, R.R.B., Takousting, B., Njong, J. & Edang, I. (2011). Trees, agroforestry and multifunctional agriculture in Cameroon. International journal of agricultural sustainability, 9, 110–119.

Dewi, S., Belcher, B. & Puntodewo, A. (2005). Village Economic Opportunity, Forest Dependence, and Rural Livelihoods in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. World Development, 33, 1419-1434.

DPMD. (2017). Desa-desa Kategori Miskin di Jawa Timur. Accessed on November 16, 2017. http://www.dpmd.jatimprov.go.id.

Ferdinand, A. (2002). Structural Equation Modeling dNature Penelitian Manajemen. Semarang : Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Fisher, M. (2004). Household Welfare and Forest Dependence in Southern Malawi. Environment and Development Economics, 9, 135-154

Grootaert ,C., Oh, G.‐T. & Swamy, A. (2002). Social Capital, Household Welfare and Poverty in Burkina Faso . Journal of African Economies, 11, 4–38.

Husken, F. (1998). Masyarakat Desa di Nature Perubahan Zaman : Sejarah Diferensiasi Social di Jawa 1830-1980. Jakarta: PT Grasindo.

Ibrahim, H. & Umar, H.S. (2008). Determinants of Poverty among farming Households in Nasarawa State, Nigeria. Media and Agricultural Marketing, 4, 11-21.

Javed-bin-Kamal. (2014). Asset Based Poverty and Wealth Accumulation in Low Income Households in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Development Studies, 37, 35-51.

Kartodiharjo, H. & Hira J. (2005). Politik Lingkungan dan Kekuasaan di Indonesia. Jakarta-Singapore : Equinox Publishing.

Kotur, B. & Anbazhagan, S. (2014). Education and work-experience – Influence on the performance. IOSR Journal of Bussiness and management, 16, 104-110

Krantz, L. (2001). The Sustainable Livelihood Approach to Poverty Reduction : An Introduction. Swedish: Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency.

Leakey, R. R. B., Tchoundjeu, Z., Schreckenberg, K., Shackleton, S., & Shackleton, C. (2005). Agroforestry tree products (AFTPs): targeting poverty reduction and enhanced livelihoods. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 3, 1–23.

Leakey, R. R. B., Tchoundjeu, Z., Schreckenberg, K., Simons, A. J., Shackleton, S., Mander, M., Wynberg, R., Shackleton, C., Sullivan, C. (2007). Trees and markets for agroforestry tree products: targeting poverty reduction and enhanced livelihoods. In: D. Garrity, A. Okono, S. Parrott (eds), World Agroforestry into the Future, World Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi, Kenya, p.11–22.

Li, T. M.. (2002). Proses Transformasi Daerah PedNaturean di Indonesia. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Mamo, G., Sjaastad, E. & Vedeld, P. (2007). Economic Dependence on Forest Resources: A Case from Dendi District, Ethiopia. Forest Policy and Economics, 9, 916-927.

Marini, D. (2015). Dampak penyaluran Bantuan Langsung Tunai (BLT) terhadap Masyarakat Miskin di Desa Perawang Barat, Kecamatan Tualang, Kabupaten Siak. Jom FISIP, 2: 1-10.

Morse, S & McNamara, N. (2013). Sustainable Livelihood Approach : A Critique of Theory and Practice. Springer. Accessed on November 17, 2017. http://www.springer.com/978-94-007-6267-1

Muhammedhussen, M. (2015). Determinants of Rural Income Poverty in Ethiopia: Case Study of Villages in Dodola District. Global Journal of Management and Business Research: B Economics and Commerce, 15: 25-32.

Munanura, I.E., Backman, K.F., Moore, D.D., Hallo, J.C. & Powell, R.B. (2014). Household Poverty Dimensions Influencing Forest Dependence at Volcanoes National Park, Rwanda: An Application of the Sustainable Livelihoods Framework. Natural Resources. 5, 1031-1047.

Ng, T. W.H. & Feldman, D.C. (2009). How Broadly Does Education Contribute to job perfomance? Personnel Psychology. 62, 89-134

Plumptre, A., Kayitare, A., Rainer, H., Gray, M., Munanura, I., Barakabuye, N. & Namara, A. (2004). The Socio-Economic Status of People Living near Protected Areas in the Central Albertine Rift. WCS, IGCP, CARE Uganda, Kampala.

Rigg, J. (2006). Land, Farming, Livelihoods and Poverty: Rethinking the Links in the Rural South. World Development. 34, 180-202.

Santini, I. & de Pascale, A.. (2012). Social capital and household poverty: the case of European Union . Working Paper No.109 , December 2012. Università degli Studi di Roma “La Sapienza” Via del Castro Laurenziano 9, 00161 Roma (RM).

Sarman, M. (1997). Kemiskinan dan pemberdayaan ekonomi rakyat: pelajaran dari program IDT. Prisma 1 edisi Januari 1997, pp 33-41.

Sunderlin, W.D., Angelsen, A., Belcher, B., Burgers, P., Nasi, R., Santoso, L. & Wunder, S. (2005). Livelihoods, Forests, and Conservation in Developing Countries: An Overview. World Development, 33, 1383-1402.

Tchoundjeu, Z., Degrande, A., Leakey, R. R. B., Nimino, G., Kemajou, E., Asaah, E., Facheux, C., Mbile, P., Mbosso, C., Sado, T., Tsobeng, A. (2010). Impacts of participatory tree domestication on farmer livelihoods in west and central Africa. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods, 19, 217–234.

Tenzin, G., Otsuka, K. & Natsuda, K. (2015). Can Social Capital Reduce Poverty? A Study of Rural Households in Eastern Bhutan. Asian Economic Journal. 29, 243–264.

Tenzin,G. & Natsuda, K. (2016). Social capital, household income, and community development in Bhutan: a case study of a dairy cooperative. Development in Practice. 26, 467-480.

Uphoff, N. & C. M. Wijayaratna. (2000). Demonstrated Benefits from Social Capital: The Productivity of Farmer Organizations in Gal Oya, Sri Lanka. World Development. 28, 1875–1890.

Vedeld, P., Jumane, A., Wapalila, G. & Songorwa, A. (2012). Protected Areas, Poverty and Conflicts: A Livelihood Case Study of Mikumi National Park, Tanzania. Forest Policy and Economics, 21, 20-31.

Yoserizal., and Yesi. (2018). Conflict Of Interest Among Stakeholders In Tesso Nilo National Park (Tnnp) (Konflik Antar Pemangku Kepentingan Di Taman Nasional Tess Nilo (TNTN)). Jurnal Antropologi: Isu-Isu Sosial Budaya, 19 (2), 101-107. doi:https://doi.org/10.25077/jaisb.v19.n2.p101-107.2017

StatisticsStatistik Artikel

Artikel ini sudah dibaca : 2048 kali
Dokumen Pdf sudah dibaca/diunduh : 34 kali