_001.jpg)
Hide
Show all
Email this article Agen Ganda dan Perubahan Praktik Pertanian
Author(s)
Firdaus Marbun (FISIP, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, West Java)
Abstract
This article aims to explain the role of dual agents in bringing about changes in agricultural practices. Starting from the phenomenon of changing plant species that occurred in Parbotihan Village, Onan Ganjang District, Humbang Hasundutan Regency. Changes in these types of crops often occur in a short period of time and are followed by most farmers. These changes sometimes occur without considering the adequacy of land, cultivation knowledge, and capital capacity. So, often the changes that occur are not profitable for them. On the other hand, these changes also change the cultivation pattern which requires farmers to learn from the beginning as a consequence of changing the types of plants. This research was conducted during the research period of my thesis by collecting data through observation and interviews. The selected informants are farmers who are involved in changing practices. The author found that the role of multiple agents such as relatives, friends, skippers, and group leaders with different capacities had a role in influencing farmers' actions. Multiple agents act as initiators, motivators, introductors, educators, and interventors. This research also shows that the social arena as public space becomes an effective arena in exchanging information and influences that encourage practice change.
Keywords
Multiple Agent; Agency; Farmer; Agricultural; Parbotihan Village
Klik untuk membaca artikel penuh Pdf
References
Agarwal, R. (2017). Agency and selfhood among young Palauan returnees. In J. Taylor & H. Lee (Eds.), Mobilities of Return (pp. 99-122): ANU Press.
Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109-137. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.109
Ahearn, L. M. (2013). Privileging and affecting agency. In Privilege, agency and affect (pp. 240-247): Springer.
BPS. (2020). Kecamatan Onan Ganjang dalam Angka 2020: BPS Kabupaten Humbang Hasundutan.
Busby, C. (1999). Agency, power and personhood: Discourses of gender and violence in a fishing community in South India. Critique of Anthropology, 19(3), 227-248.
Desai, A. (2010). Dilemmas of devotion: religious transformation and agency in Hindu India. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 16(2), 313-329. Retrieved from http://remote-lib.ui.ac.id:2063/stable/40606102
Duranti, A. (2004). Agency in language. A companion to linguistic anthropology, 451473.
Eickelkamp, U. (2010). Children and Youth in Aboriginal Australia: An Overview of the Literature. Anthropological Forum, 20(2), 147-166. doi:10.1080/00664677.2010.487297
Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What Is Agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962-1023. doi:10.1086/231294
Giddens, A. (1976). Classical Social Theory and the Origins of Modern Sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 81(4), 703-729. Retrieved from http://remote-lib.ui.ac.id:2063/stable/2777595
Goddard, V. A. (2000). The virgin and the state. Gender, Agency, and Change: Anthropological Perspectives, 179.
Kabeer, N. (2005). Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment: A Critical Analysis of the Third Millennium Development Goal. Gender and Development, 13(1), 13-24. Retrieved from http://remote-lib.ui.ac.id:2063/stable/20053132
Karp, I. (1986). Agency and Social Theory: A Review of Anthony Giddens. [New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies; Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis; A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. Vol. 1. Power, Property and the State]. American Ethnologist, 13(1), 131-137. Retrieved from http://remote-lib.ui.ac.id:2063/stable/644591
Kinseng, R. A. (2017). Struktugensi: sebuah teori tindakan. Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan, 5(2), 1-11.
Mele, A. R. (2003). Motivation and agency: Oxford University Press.
Mouzelis, N. P., & Mouzelēs, N. P. (2008). Modern and postmodern social theorizing: Bridging the divide: Cambridge University Press.
Ortner, S. B. (2006). Anthropology and Social Theory: Culture, Power, and the Acting Subject: Duke University Press.
Prasetijo, A. (2015). Pergerakan Sosial: Antara Marxian dan Non Marxian. Jurnal Antropologi: Isu-isu Sosial Budaya, 17(1), 65-70.
Prihandiani, A. F. (2017). Menyebarluaskan pembelajaran agrometeorologi: variasi luaran pada keagenan petani pengukur curah hujan Indramayu= Diseminating agrometeorological learning variation of outcomes of Indramayu rainfall observer farmers agency.
Putri, S. E., Damsar, D., & Alfiandi, B. (2019). PEMETAAN JARINGAN SOSIAL DALAM ORGANISASI: Studi Pada Distributor Tupperware Unit Simabur Indah di Batusangkar. Jurnal Antropologi: Isu-isu Sosial Budaya, 20(2), 129-143.
Roviansyah, U. P. (2013). Dinamika Variasi Pengetahuan Petani Klub Pengukur Curah Hujan Indramayu dalam Menngantisipasi Kondisi Cuaca pada Musim Rhendeng 2013-2014. (S-1 Skripsi). Universitas Indonesia, Depok.
Ruwaida, I. (2016). Pemberdayaan dan Aksi Kolektif Perempuan: Sebuah Refleksi Sosiologis. Jurnal Masyarakat dan Budaya, 18(2), 126-135.
Sembiring, S. A. (2019). Katakan yang Benar, Jangan yang Sebenar-benarnya: Berbagi dan Tidak Berbagi Pengetahuan tentang Pestisida pada Petani Sayur Karo. (S-3 Disertation). Universitas Indonesia, Depok.
Sewell, W. H. (1992). A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1-29. Retrieved from http://remote-lib.ui.ac.id:2063/stable/2781191
Soeharso, A. (2014). Dari Minat Individual Ke Pranata Formal Penumbuhkembangan Pranata Pelepasliaran Orangutan Di Kalimantan Tengah/Arose from Individual Interest into a Formal Institution the Growth and the Development of Orangutan Release and Institution in Central Kalimantan. PhD thesis, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, West Java. Retrieved from http …,
Wicaksono, M. T. (2013). Mengantisipasi Risiko Perubahan Iklim: Dinamika dan Variasi Respon Anggota Klub Pengukur Curah Hujan Indramayu di tahun 2021-2013. (S-1` Skripsi). Universitas Indonesia, Depok.
Winarto, Y. T. (2011). Kembalinya benih dan pengetahuan lokal dalam budi daya padi. Bisa Dèwèk.: Kisah Perjuangan Petani Pemulia Tanaman di Indramayu, 201-229.
Zenker, O. (2012). On prophets, godfathers, rebels, and prostitutes: Distributed agency in the Irish language revival of Northern Ireland. Zeitschrift für Ethnologie, 23-45.
Statistik Artikel
Artikel ini sudah dibaca : 447 kaliDokumen Pdf sudah dibaca/diunduh : 5 kali
