KONFLIK GAM-RI DAN KERENTANAN PANGAN MASYARAKAT TRANSMIGRAN

Author(s)
Amiruddin Ketaren (University of Malikussaleh)
Pangeran Putra Perkasa Alam Nasution (University of Malikussaleh)
Abstract

This article presents a narrative snippet of circumstances of the food security over the Javanese transmigrants during the Acehnese Freedom Movement (GAM) vs Indonesian Government (NKRI) conflict. The data presented through a case study in Cot Girek sub-district, Aceh Utara district, Aceh. The article ellaborates food availability strategies during the conflict, food accessibility, food security. The narration in this article is presented based on data obtained by qualitative research methods. Primary data obtained by interview (in-depth). The narrative notion in this paper propose that conflict often occurs as a result of some past memories coverage racial exclusion, religion, to political and economic discrimination; including the seizure of strategic resource controls, such as land, water, trade routes, and mineral deposits of the earth.

Dissatisfaction that encompasses the disparity of land distribution and discriminatory economic policies that hinder decent living standards for every community. Tensions escalate into violent conflicts especially as economic conditions worsen and people face a subsistence crisis. Conflict is created when everyone feels that they have nothing to lose and are therefore willing to fight for resources, political power, and cultural respect.

It is fitting for all parties to ensure social integration in the proper arrangement of economic and political distribution and in the spirit of equality. On the issue of food security, the goal is to create conditions for everyone at any time to gain food to support survival.
Keywords
Conflict of ‘GAM-RI’, Community of Java Transmigrants, Vulnerability and Food Security.
Klik untuk membaca artikel penuh
Pdf
References

Adwani, dkk. 2004. “Perlindungan Terhadap Anak di Daerah Konflik Bersenjata Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam”. Laporan Hasil Penelitian, Universitas Syiah Kuala.

Ahimsa-Putra, H.S. 1985. “Etnosains dan Etnometodologi: Sebuah Perbandingan”. Masyarakat Indonesia, Majalah Ilmu-ilmu Sosial Indonesia. Thn. XII (2): 103-133. Jakarta: LIPI.

-------------------------- 2007. Paradigma, Epistemologi, dan Metode Ilmu Sosial-Budaya (Sebuah Pemetaan). Makalah disampaikan dalam pelatihan ‘Metodologi Penelitian’ di Yogyakarta. Penyelenggara: CRCS-UGM.

Al Chaidar, (eds.). 1999. Aceh Bersimbah Darah: Mengungkap Penerapan Status Daerah Operasi Militer (DOM) di Aceh 1989 – 1998. Jakarta: Pustaka Al-Kautsar.

Dilley, M. and Boudreau, T. E. (2001). “Coming to Terms with Vulnerability: A Critique of the Food Security Definition”. Food Policy, Vol. 26 (3):229-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-9192(00)00046-4

Hensengerth, O. 2011. “Violence Research in Northeast and Southeast Asia: Main Themes and Direction”. IJCV, Vol. 5 (1):55-86. http://www.ijcv.org/index.php/ijcv/article/view/119/pdf_46

Kell, T. 1995. The Roots of Acehnese Rebellion (1989–1992). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.

Oliver-Smith dan Hoffman, S.M. (eds.). 2002. Catastrophe and Culture: The Anthropology of Disaster. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.

Reid, A. 1969. The Contest for North Sumatra, Atjeh, the Netherlands and Britain 1858–1898. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya Press.

Ricklefs, M.C. 1993. A History of Modern Indonesia since C1300. London: Macmillan.

Ridwan. 2000. Kumpulan Hasil Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah Konflik Aceh. Jakarta: Yayasan Pengembangan SDM.

Singh, D.K. 2010. “Women, Security, Peace And Conflict In South Asia.” The Indian Journal of Political Science, 71(2), pp. 651-661. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42753724

Spradley, J.P. 2007. Metode Etnografi. Terj. M. Zulfa Elizabeth. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.

Sugiarti, E., dkk. 2009. “Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam (NAD): Collective Memory Masyarakat Aceh Tentang Konflik GAM–RI”. Laporan Hibah Kompetitif Penelitian Sesuai Prioritas Nasional Batch II. Tahun Anggaran 2009. Universitas Airlangga.

Williams, N.E. 2013. “How community organizations moderate the effect of armed conflict on migration in Nepal.” Population Studies, 67(3), pp. 353-369. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43287894

StatisticsStatistik Artikel

Artikel ini sudah dibaca : 37 kali
Dokumen Pdf sudah dibaca/diunduh : 2 kali